rounded corner
rounded corner
top border

Chart Presentation: Lights and Tunnels


Bookmark and Share

The reality is that money continues to flee risk as long-term bond prices trend higher. To argue in favor of the equity market is, to a certain extent, to argue against the bond market. In past issues we have stated time and time again that betting against the bond market is rarely a good idea. Yet... we apparently are going to do exactly that in today’s issue.

Below is a comparative view of the S&P 500 Index , the ratio between copper and gold futures, and the ratio between the share price of Goldman Sachs and the CBOE Volatility Index .

The copper/gold ratio tends to trend with long-term Treasury yields. When copper prices are stronger than gold prices the trend for yields is usually higher while strength in gold goes with falling yields.

The GS/VIX ratio is something that we cobbled together back in 2008. The argument was that GS represents one form of ‘the market’ while the VIX tends to rise in response to cyclical weakness. A rising ratio reflects a more bullish trend for cyclical growth.

In late 2008 the GS/VIX ratio bottomed and turned higher as the Asian equity markets began to recover. A month or so later the copper/gold ratio reached bottom indicating that long-term Treasury yields had at least stopped falling.

With both ratios turning higher the base trend for the SPX was starting to improve although it would take into March of 2009 before this index finally pivoted back to the upside.

Our point is that the GS/VIX ratio reached a correction low in May of this year while the copper/gold ratio found bottom in June. For the past one to two months both ratios have been rising suggesting that even in the face of falling interest rates there is a potential trend pointing towards a return to cyclical growth.

To the extent that the SPX lagged the recovery for both ratios by a number of months from the end of 2008 into early 2009 our view is that as long as these ratios are tracking higher it is only a matter of time before stock prices swing upwards. Of course ‘only a matter of time’ might mean weeks or even months of lower equity prices butwe tend to feel a bit more optimistic when we can see the light at the end of the tunnel.

klombies_072210_1.JPG

Equity/Bond Markets

There is a very strong inverse relationship between equities and bonds at present. Our concern is that the bond market tends to be ‘right’ and since it keeps making new highs... the path of least resistance for stocks is still clearly lower.

Since we are going to argue with this assertion we might as well attempt to explain why we are following such a dangerous path.

Below is a chart comparison between the SPX and the U.S. 10-year T-Note futures.

The first point is that when bonds go up... stocks go down. Conversely when stocks go up... bonds go down.

The second point is that the bond market has tended to set the trend when bonds bottom and turn higher while equities set the trend when they bottom and turn higher.

At the ends of December 2009 and March 2010 the bond market bottomed and turned higher. The equity markets continued to push upwards as the previous quarter’s earnings were released in January and April.

Once the bulk of earnings were reported the stock market collapsed as an offset to rising bond prices. In both instances the rising trend for bond prices ultimately served to crater the equity markets.

In early February the equity market bottomed and turned higher. This marked the high point for bond prices. Yet the bond market did not begin to weaken until the second half of March as the SPX moved to new recovery highs.

The argument has been that we might not need weaker bond prices to swing the equity markets higher; rather strong equity prices will serve to first cap the rise in the bond market while a very strong equity market may be required to actually pull bond prices lower.

Further below is a comparison between copper futures and the price spread or difference between 30-year and 10-year Treasury futures. The 30-10 spread is another way of viewing the overall trend for bond prices.

Our view is that copper prices trend inversely to bond prices. In other words as long as copper prices were trending lower it made sense that  bond prices were still rising.

This particular argument put copper prices and the SPX on the same side of the equation. If copper futures OR the SPX broke up through the resistance line then our sense was that the other would follow in short order with bond prices turning back to the down side.

The problem yesterday was that copper futures broke out through support but the SPX failed once again at the resistance line as long-term Treasury prices rose to new recovery highs. If copper futures do not fail back below 3.00 later this week a case can be made that the first crack in the rising trend for bond prices has finally emerged.

klombies_072210_2.JPG

 

klombies_072210_3.JPG

Read More at TraderPlanet.com »


Recent articles from this author



About the author


Kevin Klombies
Senior Analyst, TraderPlanet.com

Kevin Klombies is a prolific writer and market analyst. After graduating in 1980 from the University of Saskatchewan with a Bachelor of Commerce degree (Honours) in Finance/Economics, he was a broker for about 16 years for Wood Gundy Inc./CIBC Wood Gundy (changed name around 1990) Private Client Division.

While at Wood Gundy, he began to create the intermarket work that would later become the IMRA newsletter. He recalls starting with a DOS version of Metastock that he used to print out charts, drawing lines on them with a pen and ruler and taping them together upside down (at times).

The first market review that he put together was in 1988 and was based on annual percentage changes in U.S. M1 versus the equity markets. It ended up going from desk to desk right to the Bank of Canada, which said there was, in fact, no relationship between money supply growth and the equity markets (“which probably explains why I have so little respect for central banks,” he says).

Klombies says his broker career was uninspiring, mainly because he spent way too many hours running charts and too little time prospecting for business. He found that what he liked best was analyzing the markets and what he liked least was selling, marketing, and client service. So he eventually left the business and continued to work on the analysis while doing some trading and consulting.

He has been featured on a number of web sites, interviewed by Reuters TV in London and marketed by Agora Inc. (Daily Reckoning, etc.), but the majority of what he does is done privately and quietly.

Published by Barchart
Home  •  Charts & Quotes  •  Commentary  •  Authors  •  Education  •  Broker Search  •  Trading Tools  •  Help  •  Contact  •  Advertise With Us  •  Commodities
Markets: Currencies  •   Energies  •   Financials  •   Grains  •   Indices  •   Meats  •   Metals  •   Softs

The information contained on InsideFutures.com is believed to be accurate but is not guaranteed. Market data is furnished on an exchange delayed basis by Barchart.com. Data transmission or omissions shall not be made the basis for any claim, demand or cause for action. No information on the site, nor any opinion expressed, constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any futures or options contracts. InsideFutures.com is not a broker, nor does it have an affiliation with any broker.

Copyright ©2005-2012 InsideFutures.com, a Barchart.com product. All rights reserved.

About Us  •   Sitemap  •   Legal  •   Privacy Statement